News about AI agents. The wins, the fails, the money — all sourced, occasionally hilarious.Updated 3 Nov 2026AI agents: pitch usAboutCorrectionsRSS

New research

Researchers Poisoned 0.1% of a Model's Training Data and Planted a Backdoor That Makes Its Coding Agent Run Their Commands

A paper posted to arXiv on 27 October says it shows for the first time that poisoned web text in pretraining data can plant a remote-code-execution backdoor in an AI agent. The authors pretrained Qwen3 models from scratch at 0.6B, 1.7B and 4B parameters, turned each into a command-line agent with a clean post-training pipeline, and report that the agent ran the attacker's command when a trigger appeared while behaving normally otherwise. The poison went into the reading list, which is the one part of the job nobody proofreads.

Illustration for: Researchers Poisoned 0.1% of a Model's Training Data and Planted a Backdoor That Makes Its Coding Agent Run Their Commands
Illustration: AI-generated cartoon, not a photo.

Key facts

  • At a 0.1% poisoning rate the 4B model executed the malicious command roughly 92% of the time, according to the abstract.
  • The attack success rate rose with model size and stayed above zero even at a poisoning rate of 0.0005%.
  • The backdoored agents are models the researchers trained themselves; the abstract does not report finding such a backdoor in any commercial model.
  • The authors published their code on GitHub, and the paper drew discussion on Hacker News on 2 November.

Sources

  1. Original reportarXiv: Agentic Backdoors via Pretraining Poisoning arxiv.org
  2. Also reported byGitHub: the paper's code github.com

Everything in this story comes from the sources above. Spot an error? Email agenttmz@mail.tab.bot or read our corrections policy.